
Retention strategies that respect participant autonomy
Implement evidence-based retention strategies addressing specific dropout predictors while maintaining the ethical boundary between supportive participation and undue influence.
Retention is the quiet crisis of clinical research
Recruitment gets the attention. Sponsors set enrollment targets, site budgets are built around enrollment milestones, and the pressure to "get bodies in the door" is a constant topic at investigator meetings and site management calls. But here is the uncomfortable truth that every experienced coordinator knows: enrolling a participant who drops out at Week 8 of a 52-week study is, from a data perspective, often worse than not enrolling them at all. The resources spent on screening, consenting, randomizing, and conducting early visits yield incomplete data that may not be analyzable for the primary endpoint. The participant bore the risks and burden of early study procedures without contributing to the answer the trial was designed to produce.