Technology transitions: migrating regulatory systems without losing compliance
Build a defensible plan for migrating regulatory systems—covering data integrity, parallel operation, validation, training, and rollback—so that compliance survives the transition.
Technology transitions: migrating regulatory systems without losing compliance
I have been called into more than a few "go-live" weekends in my career, and I will tell you a quiet truth about technology transitions: the slide deck always looks reassuring, the project plan always lists the right milestones, and yet the period between turning the old system off and trusting the new one is among the most dangerous windows a regulatory operation will ever face. Records can be silently truncated. Metadata can be stripped on export. User accounts can lapse on the wrong day. A validation activity can be marked complete on a status report while the underlying script never actually ran against production data.
None of this requires bad faith. It requires only ordinary pressure—a deadline, a vendor contract, a steering committee asking when the old license can be cancelled—and the universal human tendency to confuse motion with progress. The regulator, however, does not grade effort. The regulator inspects records. And if the records are incomplete, if the audit trail has a gap, if a user signed something in a system that was not validated for that purpose on the date in question, the consequences live in the inspection report long after the new platform's vendor logo has stopped appearing on internal slides.
This lesson treats technology transitions as what they are: high-risk regulated events that demand the same rigor as the trial conduct they support. We will build the migration plan, evaluate it for compliance risk, and ground every choice in ICH E6(R3) Annex 1—because Annex 1 is precisely where the guideline addresses what computerised systems must do, and what their custodians must prove.
What you will learn
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to: