Sign inJoin Free
DashboardSign out
Regulatory Coordinator
Full course · Essential Records Infrastructure & Document Management
Regulatory Coordinator
Full course · Essential Records Infrastructure & Document Management
Free Lesson Preview
Module 1: Lesson 1

Teaches the RC to govern hybrid paper-electronic environments with clear policies defining the official record, certified copy requirements under Appendix C, C.2.9, and quality controls that prevent version discrepancies and audit trail gaps between systems.
A monitor arrives at a site conducting nine active clinical trials for a routine monitoring visit. The monitor requests the delegation of authority log for one of the studies. The coordinator retrieves a paper binder from the regulatory file cabinet and opens it to the delegation log tab. The monitor reviews the document, then pauses. According to the sponsor's electronic trial master file portal, the current delegation log lists seven authorized staff members. The paper version in the binder lists six. The monitor asks the coordinator which version is the official record.
The coordinator does not know. The site scanned and uploaded the original paper log to the electronic portal three months ago when the sponsor's system went live. Since then, a new sub-investigator was added to the study. The coordinator updated the electronic version in the portal because the sponsor's monitoring guidelines referenced the portal as the primary filing location. But the coordinator also updated the paper binder, because that is where the site has always maintained its delegation logs. Except the paper update was made from memory rather than from the electronic version, and the coordinator inadvertently omitted one of the original delegates who had been listed on the scanned version.
Three versions now exist: the paper original that was scanned (which no longer matches the current delegation because a sub-investigator was added), the electronic version in the sponsor's portal (which includes the new sub-investigator but was never formally designated as the official record), and the paper binder version (which includes the new sub-investigator but is missing an original delegate). None of the three match. And the site has no written policy that defines which format constitutes the official record for delegation logs, how updates should be synchronized between formats, or how the relationship between paper and electronic versions should be documented.
This is not a filing error. It is a governance failure. And it is, in my experience, the single most common records deficiency at sites that operate in hybrid paper-electronic environments without a formal hybrid records management policy.
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Continue with the Regulatory Coordinator track
Enroll to access all courses in the Regulatory Coordinator track.
Unlock the full courseFree Lesson Preview
Module 1: Lesson 1

Teaches the RC to govern hybrid paper-electronic environments with clear policies defining the official record, certified copy requirements under Appendix C, C.2.9, and quality controls that prevent version discrepancies and audit trail gaps between systems.
A monitor arrives at a site conducting nine active clinical trials for a routine monitoring visit. The monitor requests the delegation of authority log for one of the studies. The coordinator retrieves a paper binder from the regulatory file cabinet and opens it to the delegation log tab. The monitor reviews the document, then pauses. According to the sponsor's electronic trial master file portal, the current delegation log lists seven authorized staff members. The paper version in the binder lists six. The monitor asks the coordinator which version is the official record.
The coordinator does not know. The site scanned and uploaded the original paper log to the electronic portal three months ago when the sponsor's system went live. Since then, a new sub-investigator was added to the study. The coordinator updated the electronic version in the portal because the sponsor's monitoring guidelines referenced the portal as the primary filing location. But the coordinator also updated the paper binder, because that is where the site has always maintained its delegation logs. Except the paper update was made from memory rather than from the electronic version, and the coordinator inadvertently omitted one of the original delegates who had been listed on the scanned version.
Three versions now exist: the paper original that was scanned (which no longer matches the current delegation because a sub-investigator was added), the electronic version in the sponsor's portal (which includes the new sub-investigator but was never formally designated as the official record), and the paper binder version (which includes the new sub-investigator but is missing an original delegate). None of the three match. And the site has no written policy that defines which format constitutes the official record for delegation logs, how updates should be synchronized between formats, or how the relationship between paper and electronic versions should be documented.
This is not a filing error. It is a governance failure. And it is, in my experience, the single most common records deficiency at sites that operate in hybrid paper-electronic environments without a formal hybrid records management policy.
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Continue with the Regulatory Coordinator track
Enroll to access all courses in the Regulatory Coordinator track.
Unlock the full course